best tv | category | Perbaiki Tv Lcd | Servis Tv Lcd | Servis Tv

<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 37.5pt; margin-bottom: 5.25pt; margin-left: 0cm; margin-right: 0cm; margin-top: 3.75pt; mso-outline-level: 1; vertical-align: baseline;">
The 2013 TVs of CES are bigger and smarter, but what
about the picture?<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 12.75pt; vertical-align: baseline;">
The 2013 Consumer Electronics show is a wrap, and now that we know
something about the hundreds of new TVs models, it's worth asking whether all
those new technologies will improve what matters: picture quality.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
by . David Katzmaier</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
 </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhJnUvaJxt46n-aqSW5s_ibvqnZQyOTLdL-U21nA3ThdrYXysMw_u1H1DfLgiOVSi41skkkUih24Bgi94AJDEbDFdQJ1f5Emf4OtiZK2uCgQ2du5FdqBNetMn-aVQJsNRsiB-EFcciYqqrS/s1600/gbr11.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="213" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhJnUvaJxt46n-aqSW5s_ibvqnZQyOTLdL-U21nA3ThdrYXysMw_u1H1DfLgiOVSi41skkkUih24Bgi94AJDEbDFdQJ1f5Emf4OtiZK2uCgQ2du5FdqBNetMn-aVQJsNRsiB-EFcciYqqrS/s320/gbr11.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
 </div>
<div style="line-height: 15.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm; margin-left: 0cm; margin-right: 0cm; margin-top: 7.5pt; vertical-align: baseline;">
Will
flat-panel TV picture quality get even better in 2013?<o:p></o:p></div>
<div style="line-height: 15.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin: 0cm; vertical-align: baseline;">
I'm guessing "Yes" in the case of the <a href="http://ces.cnet.com/best-of-ces/">Best of CES</a> nominee <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/flat-panel-tvs/panasonic-tc-p55zt60/4505-6482_7-35567247.html">Panasonic TC-PZT60</a> and the re-engineered <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/tvs/samsung-pn60f8500/4505-6475_7-35566923.html">Samsung UNF8500</a>,
very likely the two best-performing TVs of 2013 under $10,000.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div style="line-height: 15.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin: 0cm; vertical-align: baseline;">
But those two are hardly the TV hardware poster children of the
2013 Consumer Electronics Show, where all the headlines touted expensive <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-33199_7-57364224-221/what-is-4k-next-generation-resolution-explained">4K</a> and <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-33199_7-57495108-221/oled-what-we-know/">OLED</a> sets -- <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-33199_7-57491766-221/why-4k-tvs-are-stupid-still/">still stupid</a> and <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-33199_7-57535070-221/samsung-lg-to-delay-55-inch-oled-tvs-until-2013/">chronically under-delivered</a>,
respectively -- as well as new gadgetry of questionable usefulness. <a href="http://cnettv.cnet.com/lg-finger-gesture-control/9742-1_53-50138541.html">Finger-gesture control</a>,
anyone?<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
 </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhOJfZyqDmvbkW8k5O23T-akyWy6-4sa7dqD63tfXAbEarOp064RNF2_4C5GXrHcrFq5JmTfkR1FTxnf_ovvW3l3pBDyT3-ps4Esau6j81DqxLmxbJ59aC_3RnX1E8r2Xbvb-PFisrRCLAv/s1600/gbr21.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhOJfZyqDmvbkW8k5O23T-akyWy6-4sa7dqD63tfXAbEarOp064RNF2_4C5GXrHcrFq5JmTfkR1FTxnf_ovvW3l3pBDyT3-ps4Esau6j81DqxLmxbJ59aC_3RnX1E8r2Xbvb-PFisrRCLAv/s1600/gbr21.jpg" /></a></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
 </div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 15.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm; vertical-align: baseline;">
I got a chance to see both the Panasonic and the Samsung plasmas in
extended private viewing sessions and suffice it to say, I think both will be
able to surpass the mind-bogglingly good<a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/flat-panel-tvs/panasonic-tc-p65vt50/4505-6482_7-35118305.html">Panasonic TC-PVT50 of 2012</a> at doing what TVs are supposed to do best: make beautiful pictures. I can't
wait to review them, nor to test a few other TVs that stood out from a picture
quality perspective.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 15.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm; vertical-align: baseline;">
Other TVs that piqued my videophile
interest 
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 15.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm; margin-left: 30.0pt; margin-right: 0cm; margin-top: 0cm; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list 36.0pt; text-indent: -18.0pt; vertical-align: baseline;">
·        
<a href="http://ces.cnet.com/8301-34451_1-57562495/panasonic-sticks-with-plasma-heavy-tv-lineup/">Panasonic's entire plasma
lineup</a> Based on what I saw at the show, <a href="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0Ampx82Q1aPMEdFE5VExlY3RwZ1RTUUlSMU5GbW13UWc&output=html">last year's reviews</a>and <a href="http://ces.cnet.com/8301-34451_1-57562651/panasonic-web-site-reveals-preorder-pricing-on-some-2013-tvs/">this year's pricing so far</a>, I wouldn't be surprised if the
2013 Best TVs list at CNET looked as top-heavy with Panasonic plasmas as <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/best-high-definition-tvs/">the 2012 list</a>. Each of the company's 2013 plasma series
models, with the exception of the lowest-end X60 perhaps, should be among the
best-performing in its price class.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 15.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm; margin-left: 30.0pt; margin-right: 0cm; margin-top: 0cm; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list 36.0pt; text-indent: -18.0pt; vertical-align: baseline;">
·        
<a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/tvs/sony-kdl-55w900/4505-6475_7-35561946.html">Sony KDL-55W900A</a> The
successor to our <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/flat-panel-tvs/sony-kdl-55hx850/4505-6482_7-35118056.html">favorite edge-lit LED TV of 2012</a>, the W900A keeps the
company's excellent <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/2795-6482_7-399.html">local-dimming</a> scheme but is unfortunately only available in one size: 55 inches.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 15.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm; margin-left: 30.0pt; margin-right: 0cm; margin-top: 0cm; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list 36.0pt; text-indent: -18.0pt; vertical-align: baseline;">
·        
<a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/tvs/vizio-m551d/4505-6475_7-35566547.html">Vizio M series</a> Meanwhile
our <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/flat-panel-tvs/vizio-m3d0kd-series/4505-6482_7-35159745.html">second-favorite edge-lit LED of 2012</a> has a whole
litter of descendants in various sizes, and all of them do local dimming too.
The company is proud of its home-grown dimming, and from what I saw on the 2012
M3D0KD series, the M should be a solid performer. It's also noteworthy that
select sizes in the very affordable<a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/flat-panel-tvs/vizio-e550i/4505-6482_7-35566744.html">E series</a> will be the first to do dimming from a "direct LED"
configuration.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 15.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm; margin-left: 30.0pt; margin-right: 0cm; margin-top: 0cm; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list 36.0pt; text-indent: -18.0pt; vertical-align: baseline;">
·        
<a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/tvs/samsung-un60f8000/4505-6475_7-35566921.html">Samsung UNF8000 series</a> The biggest
TV company is pushing its revamped Smart TV suite to the world, but to me its
engineers talked up the fact that this flagship finally put real local dimming
back into its highest-end LEDs. Both the F8000 and the <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/tvs/samsung-un55f7500/4505-6475_7-35566796.html">F7500</a> can dim the letterbox bars, which leads to big improvements in perceived
contrast for ultra-widescreen movies, but only the F8000 gets dimming across
the whole screen. From what I saw of an early sample it looked great, and color
was also exceedingly accurate.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 15.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm; margin-left: 30.0pt; margin-right: 0cm; margin-top: 0cm; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list 36.0pt; text-indent: -18.0pt; vertical-align: baseline;">
·        
<a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/tvs/samsung-un85s9/4505-6475_7-35567048.html">Samsung UN85S9</a> The winner
of the TV category for Best of <a href="http://ces.cnet.com/">CES</a> got there
partly with unique style and buzz-worthy 4K resolution, but what put it atop
other 4K sets I saw was the inclusion of local dimming from a full-array LED
backlight. It's Samsung's first so-equipped TV since the excellent <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/flat-panel-tvs/samsung-un55b8500/4505-6482_7-33740174.html">UN55B8500</a>, and my bet for the best-performing 4K TV of 2013. I
just hope it doesn't fall over and crush me during the review.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 15.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm; margin-left: 30.0pt; margin-right: 0cm; margin-top: 0cm; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list 36.0pt; text-indent: -18.0pt; vertical-align: baseline;">
·        
<a href="http://ces.cnet.com/8301-34451_1-57562520/sharp-purios-about-ultra-hd-tv/">Sharp Purios</a> The
company's first shipping 4K TV will also be the first to receive THX's 4K
display certification -- not a guarantee that it'll be a good performer, but
still a positive sign. I saw an encouraging demo where the Purios' image
processing, dubbed ICC (integrated cognitive creation), seemingly revealed a
bit more depth and detail than a comparison model. I also liked the company's
new "Moth eye" screen finish, which straddles the line between matte
and glossy and in demo form did a great job suppressing reflections. I was told
the finish might not make it onto the shipping Purios, but I hope it does.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 15.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm; margin-left: 30.0pt; margin-right: 0cm; margin-top: 0cm; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list 36.0pt; text-indent: -18.0pt; vertical-align: baseline;">
·        
<a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/home-theater-projectors/lg-hecto-laser-projector/4505-7858_7-35558335.html">LG Hecto laser projector</a> At $10,000
the Hecto has the distinction of being the cheapest 100-inch-or-larger TV shown
at CES 2013, trumping the <a href="http://ces.cnet.com/8301-34451_1-57562588/hisenses-whopping-110-inch-xt900-tv/">110</a><a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/flat-panel-tvs/samsung-110-inch-4k/4505-6482_7-35567550.html">-inch</a> <a href="http://ces.cnet.com/8301-34451_1-57561173/westinghouse-to-show-110-inch-4k-tv-at-ces/">LEDs</a> by a few hundred thousand dollars. Essentially a deconstructed
rear-projection TV, this short-throw laser<a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/best-home-theater-projectors/">projector</a> includes its own screen and even has speakers. It's the only product of its
kind from a major maker, and I'm excited to see how it competes against
similarly-priced 80-inch <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/led-tvs/">LED TVs</a>.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 15.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm; margin-left: 30.0pt; margin-right: 0cm; margin-top: 0cm; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list 36.0pt; text-indent: -18.0pt; vertical-align: baseline;">
·        
<a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/tvs/lg-55la8600/4505-6475_7-35560502.html">LG LA8600</a> Even LG's
best TVs last year had disappointing performance, but the company's engineers
promised me they've done better this year. I assume LG's best non-4K 2013 LED,
the LA8600, will showcase those improvements.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 15.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm; margin-left: 30.0pt; margin-right: 0cm; margin-top: 0cm; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list 36.0pt; text-indent: -18.0pt; vertical-align: baseline;">
·        
<a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/tvs/lg-55em9700/4505-6475_7-35560367.html">LG 55PM9700</a> After more
than 10 years of doing what I do, I'm more excited to review LG's OLED TV than
I've ever been to review any product. Ever. Will its color-filter WRGB
technology affect the jaw-dropping contrast and color response I expect from
OLED? What about off-angle, color accuracy, even passive 3D? I hope to know
soon how our third Best of CES nominee fares.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhhjVMaNoibmRNX5rVVtKqOgT-jKjUXe73OUJtLK-m2FEZzvEDLuTTfga8tKe-7l2A_6I4qP9jG3qsxAPkht_6Q4UXkHoamwF4WdICtEXKIvETWJVlnzCZGuMU4diiPL0B5vC-CdFAyw97B/s1600/gbr31.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhhjVMaNoibmRNX5rVVtKqOgT-jKjUXe73OUJtLK-m2FEZzvEDLuTTfga8tKe-7l2A_6I4qP9jG3qsxAPkht_6Q4UXkHoamwF4WdICtEXKIvETWJVlnzCZGuMU4diiPL0B5vC-CdFAyw97B/s1600/gbr31.jpg" /></a></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
 </div>
<div style="line-height: 15.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin: 0cm; vertical-align: baseline;">
Uh, what about 4K and OLED? 
In our preview we <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-33199_7-57557653-221/deja-vu-oled-and-4k-will-dominate-ces-2013-tv-news/">called out both of these
buzz-grabbing trends</a> as
the stars of CES, but it's important to remember that showstopping display
technology usually takes years to go mainstream. You'll be hard-pressed to find
4K TVs anywhere on store shelves in 2013, and OLED will be as rare as a <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-13746_7-10393900-48.html">Tesla Roadster</a>. The
TVs with both, introduced by <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/tvs/sony-4k-oled-tv/4505-6475_7-35567336.html">Sony</a> and <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-33199_7-57562772-221/panasonic-unleashes-first-prototype-4k-oled/">Panasonic</a>, were
prototypes that are still years away.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div style="line-height: 15.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm; margin-left: 0cm; margin-right: 0cm; margin-top: 7.5pt; vertical-align: baseline;">
TVs
with 4K, or Ultra High Definition (UHD) resolution, were front and center in
nearly every major maker's booth, and their huge screens and slow-moving,
short-looping demo material often looked very good (although often worse than I
expected). No pricing was announced for any of the major makers' new 4K sets,
however, and product managers I pressed on the question were universally more
tight-lipped than usual -- not a good sign.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
 </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjMbpflVjyRlwFRhP-6TxHWeay_rw7ymYRykk7f-miqvgEZcIBqYumgA9jDC3Pcyo-K-WgKrt0g-hUozJy29SG-N14V6Q02Xt_FREOkclBRAIw8t83XVf_oUwSjn13o0GJSBZLI2iw8YMAG/s1600/gbr41.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjMbpflVjyRlwFRhP-6TxHWeay_rw7ymYRykk7f-miqvgEZcIBqYumgA9jDC3Pcyo-K-WgKrt0g-hUozJy29SG-N14V6Q02Xt_FREOkclBRAIw8t83XVf_oUwSjn13o0GJSBZLI2iw8YMAG/s1600/gbr41.jpg" /></a></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
 </div>
<div style="line-height: 15.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin: 0cm; vertical-align: baseline;">
Sony mentioned "a cost that is right around that of a premium
HDTV" for its <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/tvs/sony-xbr-55x900a/4505-6475_7-35561928.html">smaller XBR-X900</a> sizes, and I'm guessing that means
$5,000 for the 55-incher. While <a href="http://ces.cnet.com/1606-34451_1-50138469.html">LG's smaller 4K models</a> might cost a bit less than that, I
don't think you'll be able to buy a non-Chinese 4K TV for less than $4K this
year. I'll be interested to test new sets from Chinese makers like Hisense (<a href="http://ces.cnet.com/8301-34451_1-57562613/hisense-offers-smaller-uhd-tvs/">its 4K TVs go down to 50 inches</a>)
and TCL, but I'm not expecting them to match the picture quality of the
established brands.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div style="line-height: 15.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin: 0cm; vertical-align: baseline;">
And then there are OLED TVs, which LG says will<a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/tvs/lg-55em9700/4505-6475_7-35560367.html">finally be shipping in March
for $12,000</a>. Even if you have that kind of cash I'm guessing it will
be nearly impossible to lay your hands on one -- initial quantities will be
extremely limited. The only other TV maker close to production is Samsung,
which says "this year" for its <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/tvs/samsung-kn55f9500-real-oled/4505-6475_7-35561989.html">KN55F9500</a>. But the
company still hasn't released a final design, and I'm still skeptical the TV
will ship.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div style="line-height: 15.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin: 0cm; vertical-align: baseline;">
Whizbang doodads, newfangled
thingamabobs, miscellaneous frippery 
No CES TV wrap-up would be complete without passing mention of all the extra
bullet points TV makers will pack onto specification sheets that have nothing
to do with the core mission of making great pictures. I'll try to get it all
into one paragraph.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
 </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg-G1R_iUOeaOiZP-cKKWF0uVhosdTMdy1fPcquRwm-eJO5_6dRyXxUrdRltcM-Jlw375J1rvtTq8R-kAXrCKb7Vt5euxIt7B2iyTJJHIp_TZck_kn_FvPb3UKGBJYPjw1LF5q1CiWk2NOc/s1600/images+(44).jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg-G1R_iUOeaOiZP-cKKWF0uVhosdTMdy1fPcquRwm-eJO5_6dRyXxUrdRltcM-Jlw375J1rvtTq8R-kAXrCKb7Vt5euxIt7B2iyTJJHIp_TZck_kn_FvPb3UKGBJYPjw1LF5q1CiWk2NOc/s1600/images+(44).jpg" /></a></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
 </div>
<div style="line-height: 15.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin: 0cm; vertical-align: baseline;">
Samsung, <a href="http://ces.cnet.com/8301-34451_1-57562479/how-samsung-might-actually-get-featuritis-under-control/">the king of featuritis</a>,
has a new <a href="http://ces.cnet.com/1606-34451_1-50138434.html">Smart TV suite</a> that can control your cable box as
well as recommend upcoming shows and consolidate searches of on-demand video
sources (just not Amazon). Sony is <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/tvs/sony-kdl-50r550a/4505-6475_7-35561978.html">pushing NFC pairing</a>,
a second-screen app, and DirecTV-friendliness. LG also touts NFC, along with
improved voice control and a <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-33199_7-57560050-221/lg-pops-out-improved-magic-motion-remote/">better motion remote</a>.
Panasonic wants to entice you with an optional pen accessory for marking up
documents onscreen (huh?), voice control, a touch-pad controller, and a pop-up
camera on<a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/flat-panel-tvs/panasonic-tc-p55vt60/4505-6482_7-35567332.html">some models</a>. Vizio
has M-Go, a studio-sanctioned streaming app, as well as a new streaming-3D
service and HTML5 support in higher-end sets. Everybody has dual-core
processors, built-in Wi-Fi, and tons of apps that you'll never use. But at
least they all have Netflix.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div style="line-height: 15.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin: 0cm; vertical-align: baseline;">
In the preview I wistfully asked for a <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-33199_7-57416346-221/i-want-my-dumb-tv/">dumb TV</a> with all the picture quality
enhancements of a flagship model for a bit less money. None was announced.
Maybe next year.<o:p></o:p></div>
 
<div class="MsoNormal">
 </div>

The 2013 TVs of CES are bigger and smarter, but what about the picture? The 2013 Consumer Electronics show is a wrap, and now that we kno...